Familial prevalence of uterine fibroids is associated with distinct clinical and molecular features
Publication details: 2005Uniform titles:- Human Reproduction
Item type | Home library | Collection | Class number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book | Ferriman information and Library Service (North Middlesex) Shelves | Staff publications for NMDX | Available |
NMUH Staff Publications
20
<h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">BACKGROUND:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Although uterine fibroids are very common, their pathogenesis and clinical behaviour are poorly understood. Since they may be prevalent in some families, we investigated whether such a prevalence was associated with distinctive clinical and molecular features.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">METHODS:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">A case-control questionnaire study of 300 multi-ethnic women with uterine fibroids at a London university hospital was undertaken, with review of case notes and immunohistochemical determination of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) in fibroids.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">RESULTS:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">When compared with families with sporadic fibroids, familial prevalence of fibroids was associated with a higher incidence of abdominal swelling (59.1% versus 41.6%; P=0.037), menorrhagia (84.4% versus 51.9%; P=0.042), dysmenorrhoea (64.4% versus 46.3%; P=0.004), dyspareunia (43.2% versus 27.9%; P=0.012) and family history of cancers (52.3% versus 32.4%; P&lt;0.01). The fibroids were also more multiple (mean +/- SEM: 7 +/- 0.86 versus 3 +/- 0.42; P&lt;0.011) and strong VEGF-A expression in fibroids was more common in the familial group (64% versus 28%). Racial distribution was the same in both groups (blacks 49%, whites 33.4%, others 18.6%).</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">CONCLUSIONS:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Familial prevalence of uterine fibroids is associated with distinct clinical and molecular features that differ from those found when fibroids occur sporadically in families.</span></p>
There are no comments on this title.